May 19, 2012

Logical Fallacies In The Addiction Debate: #7 Appeal To Tradition and #8 Appeal To Common Practice

tradition needlepoint

Traditions and common practices can be persuasive, but popularity of a given practice or view simply doesn’t prove it to be correct.

Logical Fallacies In The Addiction Debate: #5 Appeal To The Masses and #6 The Bandwagon Fallacy

ad populum

  Argumentum Ad Populum An Appeal To The Masses is one of the laziest, weak minded, and philosophically revealing fallacies one can engage in.  In short, this is the form of such an argument: Conclusion X is true because everyone (or a majority of people) believes it. That’s all there is to it.  It simply [...]

Logical Fallacies In The Addiction Debate: #4 Appeal To Authority

Prof

Certainly, authority figures have been wrong about many important matters throughout the ages. For each controversial claim, we can find experts who offer vastly different conclusions. Therefore, a mere Appeal To Authority shouldn’t be enough to prove or disprove a claim – if you really care about the truth of a matter you need more than that. This fact doesn’t stop people from shouting down others in the addiction debate with nothing more than an Appeal To Authority though!

Logical Fallacies In The Addiction Debate: #3 Appeal To The Consequences Of A Belief

domino-theory

An Appeal To Consequences is often the first and last fallacious argument uttered in any debate about the disease model of addiction. This tactic may be persuasive, but it doesn’t prove anything.